Posts Tagged ‘Innovation’

Measuring How System Design Adds Value to a Business

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

With information technology, it is sometimes difficult to determine how much a system’s design contributes to the success of a business. From my experience a system’s design contributes as much as 50% or more to the success of an IT project. If you can get the system design right, system implementation is usually easier, it is less likely to have cost overruns, and it assures that the needs of the business are met. Key to good system design is having firm requirements, and then identifying the right design that meets the requirements.



Businessweek has a good article, Ten Ways to Measure Design’s Success, on how to measure the effectiveness of design in terms of business success. These measures are also good guidelines in terms of measuring the effectiveness of the design of an information system. See below on methods that can be used to measure how good a system is designed.


10 Measures of Good Information System Design

1. Purchase Influence. Measure a system’s design in terms of Return on Investment (ROI). If you role out a new system or re-design the system, measure the increase revenue less the cost of the system. This would be appropriate for a new software product in a software company or a customer-facing system in a service company.

2. New Markets. Measure a system’s design on how well it enabled a business to enter a new market or gain market share. This could be a new prepackage product or a system that contributes to providing a new service for a company.

3. Brand Image and Corporate Reputation. Measure a system’s design in terms of how it increases brand image and reputation. The design of corporate web sites are good candidates to measure by brand performance. Good examples of web sites are Yahoo!, Google, and Bing. Which web site design is increasing brand image and corporate reputation?

4. Time to Market. Measure a system’s design in terms of how fast new or enhanced product and services can be brought to market. Does it take you a year to do a major software upgrade in order to roll out a new product or service? Or is your system agile where it can adapt and change in order for the business to take advantage of business opportunities faster than the competition?

5. Cost Savings. How is your business doing in regard to such traditional financial ratios such as return on assets and net cash flow to sales? With so many business processes automated, a business’ financial performance is more and more directly affected by how well their systems are designed.

6. Enable Product and Service Innovation. How is your system’s design enabling product and service innovation? As more and more business processes are automated, the design of your systems either enable or inhibit innovation. Are your systems’ designs solving last year’s business problems or are they focused on the future?

7. Develop Communities of Customers. For customer-facing systems, measure how effective a system’s design strengthens and increases the number of customers using the system’s services. Good examples of type systems that can be measured in terms of developing communities of customers is Facebook and Twitter.

8. Create Intellectual Property. Measure a system’s design effectiveness by considering how much a business would lose if the system’s design was stolen or reversed engineered by a competitor.

9. Improve usability. Measure a system’s design by its usability. For web sites, most companies use some type of analytics to measure how users navigate a web site. A key design measurement would be how effective is the web site at leading the web site visitor from the landing page to the desired response (fill out a lead form, buy a product, and so on).

10. Improve Sustainability. Measure how well a system’s design uses and conserves resources. This can be from a “green” perspective as well as how efficient the system is at doing its job. Does it need a lot of downtime for maintenance? Does it use a lot of resources (labor, money, etc) to operate?

As we continue to automate more and more business processes, system design becomes more and more critical to businesses. With this criticality, it becomes increasingly important that we measure the effectiveness of a system’s design to meet current and future needs of the business.


Back to IT Innovation.

Segway, Invention Versus Innovation

Sunday, August 9th, 2009

On the surface invention and innovation are closely related words, but in practice they can be worlds apart. Invention is focused inwardly on a new idea. It is a world of secrets and patents. Innovation on the other hand is focused outwardly and is a process that takes an idea (an invention) and applies it successfully to a given situation or problem. Innovation is a world of collaboration, adjustments, and adapting to the market. See Wikipedia for more on innovation and how it differs from invention.

Segway Rider

The Dorky Segway – Great Invention Lacking Innovation



Most Inventions Fail Without Innovation.


TechDirt’s posting, Why Segway Failed To Reshape The World: Focused On Invention, Rather Than Innovation, has a great write-up on innovation and invention using the Segway as an example. Here the Segway was a great invention for personal transportation, but there was no real innovation process to make it successful.

Segway – A Great Invention that Failed to Launch. The reason that the Segway failed is because people look dorky when riding a Segway. Paul Graham’s recent essay about why the Segway failed to change the world tells us that a lack of innovation killed the Segway invention from becoming a huge success. Paul tells us that the Segway made people look dorky and that a better design would have made the Segway more appealing to a mass market. Paul says in his essay:

“Curiously enough, what got Segway into this problem was that the company was itself a kind of Segway. It was too easy for them; they were too successful raising money. If they’d had to grow the company gradually, by iterating through several versions they sold to real users, they’d have learned pretty quickly that people looked stupid riding them. Instead they had enough to work in secret. They had focus groups aplenty, I’m sure, but they didn’t have the people yelling insults out of cars. So they never realized they were zooming confidently down a blind alley.”

Segway Failed the Reality Test. Sometimes it is is the little things that destroy a great, new idea. I have always liked the Segway, but the normal person does look dorky when riding them. With a bicycle, a skateboard, or a motorcycle, the rider does at least to appear to be making an effort when riding them. The rider of a bicycle, skateboard, or motorcycle seems to be one us “normal” people. With a Segway, the rider appears to make no effort when riding the Segway. The Segway rider ends up looking more like a “want-to-be” Pope riding a Pope-mobile than an “average” person. Thus, the Segway becomes relegated to selected security occupations such as mall police and outdoor security.

Prototype to Success. This is one of the reasons I am a big believer in prototyping. New ideas are great, but until you get them in front of real people you do not know whether the idea is practical. Prototyping with real people in real situations is an innovation process that adjusts and adapts the new idea to meet the market need. The new idea is then killed, validated, or transformed to make a new idea great.


Back to IT Innovation.

IT High Priests and the Lost Art of IT Innovation

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

The High Priests of IT.

IT management can so easily get into a rut when it comes to IT innovation. I am sure that most people that get into the information technology field have a great desire to innovate. As the years go by innovation seems to become their lost love. This especially happens in IT management.

The High Priest of IT - a religion that shuns IT innovation

The High Priest of IT

A religion that shuns IT innovation.


IT High Priests – a Religion of Governance and Cost Management. There is something about being in IT management that it becomes so easy to forget about innovation and just start managing your costs and infrastructure. Instead of being innovators, IT management become High Priests. Their religion becomes governance, standards, infrastructure, information security, and Return On Investment (ROI).

The Heretics – Super Users and Supper Geeks. Innovation seems to go against all of the tenets of managing IT. The people that even show a glimmer of innovation, the “super users” and the “super geeks”, are the heretics to the High Priests of IT. See Cory Doctorow posting on The High Priests of IT — And the Heretics for more on the High Priests of IT and the Heretics.

IT As Engineers That Innovate, Build, and Maintain Systems.

IT as Engineers. I am a big believer that IT is not a cost center, and that they should be thought of as engineers that innovate, build, and maintain systems. It is so easy to get into a rut where business and IT both buy into the notion that IT managers are just IT High Priests that maintain the systems and manage the costs. Yes, IT needs to maintain systems and have policies in place that maintain standards and security. At the same time, a significant objective of IT must be to innovate, re-event itself, and build new and better solutions that meet future business requirements.

The Need for an Innovation Dialog Between Business and IT. Business and IT both must challenge the notion of IT management just being the High Priests of IT. Without innovation coming within the IT organization, business users will go outside the IT organization to find IT solutions that meet their current business problems. This becomes a disjointed way to introduce new information technology into the organization, but may be the only way to innovate when the organization has a High Priest of IT. A worst scenario is when neither IT nor the business users will shepherd in new IT innovations into the business. If this IT innovation stalemate continues, the competition will eventually increase market share through their IT innovations. Business users and IT need to maintain a dialog and take action to continue to innovate in IT. See Adrian Gonzalez’s posting, Can Logistics and IT Eat Lunch Together? on the need for IT and business users to do a better job of communicating with each other.