Posts Tagged ‘FCC’

FTC shoots down Net Neutrality, says it is not needed

Thursday, June 28th, 2007

The Federal Trade commission has now come up with a position on net neutrality. Basically, they are choosing not to regulate at this time, but will continue to monitor the issues that Net Neutrality proponents are concerned about in regard to keeping internet access open and fair.



This is good news to Telecoms who would face more regulation if the Government started regulating the internet. Content providers and consumers will continue to have to be watchful that Telecoms may start giving internet access priority to premium content providers. Overall, this is good news from the FTC in that we really do not need more Government regulation on a problem that is not a problem now, and will probably not be a problem in the future.

Digg.com posts, “The Federal Trade Commission today dealt a serious blow to “Net Neutrality” proponents as it issued a reporting dismissive of claims that the government needs to get involved in preserving fairness of networks in the United States.”

read more | digg story

Regulate Having Fast Internet, Then Net Neutrality

Thursday, October 19th, 2006

FCC is about to propose definitive rules that could have major repercussions for the entire web. See Mashable’s posting, VICTORY: FCC to Mandate Net Neutrality for the Web.. I’m for a free and open internet, but not sure the Net Neutrality bandwagon will get us there. To me the Net Neutrality cause will result in more regulations. We do not even have a problem yet. The real problem for U.S. is internet is slow and expensive comparatively. Let us fix that first.

PBS had a special on Net Neutrality years ago and really things have not changed that much. I applaud PBS for bringing this issue up on National TV, but I found their coverage lacking. The Digg.com posting below describes what they covered.



Digg.com posts, “What exactly is net neutrality, and why does it seem to have everyone from Google and Yahoo! to Verizon and AT&T concerned? At 9pm tonight on most PBS stations, Moyers on America discusses the future of the Internet, including efforts by big business to buck the network-neutrality movement and why America lags behind other countries in broadband.”

I felt PBS had an overall bias for Net Neutrality and did not focus on the right problem. The Net Neutrality issue is all about whether the Government should regulate internet carriers like they regulate common carrier transportation companies. I think the real issue is what are we going to do to get our internet infrastructure upgraded to be comparable or faster than countries like Japan and Korea.

This is ridiculous that the U.S. internet is slower and more expensive that many other countries. You can blame Big Telcom and Big Cable, but what are we going to do to get comparable or better internet service than other countries?

PBS did bring up about Lafayette, LA where they are building their own internet. The problem with municipal initiatives is state and federal Governments are not necessarily supportive of these initiatives.

State and the Federal Government either need to get out of the way or come up with a viable solution for us to have cheap, fast internet. This is getting lost in the Net Neutrality dialog where everybody is focused on a Net Neutrality which has not yet become a real issue yet.

I’m starting to think that the Net Neutrality is too driven on both sides by special interest, and distracting us from the real problem – slow, expensive internet. Why is Net Neutrality the biggest issue, but there is no significant National dialog on how we are going to fix our slow, expensive internet.

We may need Net Neutrality regulation at some point, but let us fix the real problem that faces all of us today – an internet infrastructure that is slow and expensive.

Tech Manufacturers rally against Net Neutrality

Wednesday, September 20th, 2006

On the Net Neutrality issue, I tend to side on the side of the telecommunications providers. My reasoning is that Net Neutrality is a solution looking for a problem. Content providers like Google and eBay are pushing Net Neutrality, but I do not see a dire need for new legislation at this time.

Are people dying? Is not the net not fairly neutral at this time? Are people being discriminated against or being taken advantage of where legislation would make a profound and positive effect? I do not think so. I would rather have less regulation than more. We do not need new laws just because Net Neutrality sounds like a good idea. We need new laws when there is a demonstrated and dire need that will have a positive effect on the public good.

It looks like tech manufactures are siding with the telecommunications providers in coming against Net Neutrality. Less regulation is the answer for now. We can re-visit Net Neutrality when and if it becomes a problem.

Digg.com posts, “Motorola and other tech types urge Congress to hold off on extensive rules they say could disrupt the way the Internet works.”

read more | digg story